Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology ; 270:N.PAG-N.PAG, 2022.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1748053
2.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 51(3): 102311, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1611874

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The exceptional health situation related to the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required an in-depth and immediate reorganisation of gynaecological cancer care. The main objective was to assess the psychological impact of such treatment modifications during the lockdown period for gynaecological and breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicentre prospective study was conducted in three university gynaecological cancer wards (Hospices Civils de Lyon, France) during the French first lockdown (16th March to 11th May 2020). All patients with non-metastatic breast cancer or gynaecological cancer were included. Data was collected regarding treatment modifications (delay, cancellation, change of therapeutic plan). The psychological impact of treatment modifications during and after the lockdown was assessed by validated questionnaires (SF-12, EORTC-QLQ-C30, HADS). RESULTS: A total of 205 consecutive patients were included, aged 60.5 ± 1.0 years. Seven patients (3.4%) presented a SARS-CoV-2 infection, and two patients died. Treatment was maintained for 122 (59.5%) patients, postponed for 72 (35.1%) and cancelled for 11 (5.4%). During the lockdown, 35/118 (29.7%) patients suffered from confirmed anxiety and the mean fatigue-EORTC score was 48.00 ± 2.51; it was 38.64 ± 2.33 (p = 0.02) after the lockdown. After the lockdown and compared to the lockdown period, the mental SF-12 score and overall health status EORTC score were significantly higher (45.03 ± 1.06 vs 41.71 ± 1.15, p = 0.02 and 64.58 ± 1.66 vs 57.44 ± 2.02, p = 0.0007, respectively). The number of confirmed-anxiety cases was significantly higher amongst patients for whom treatment was delayed or cancelled (40.5% vs 23.7%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study quantified the treatment modifications of gynaecological cancer patients during the COVID-19 lockdown and revealed a poorer psychological state and quality of life during this period, even for patients whose treatment plan was not actually modified. Anxiety was more significant in patients with a delayed or cancelled treatment.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Communicable Disease Control , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 48(11): 777-783, 2020 11.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-812177

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The exceptional health situation related to the SARS-Cov2 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) required a deep and very quickly adaptation of management practices in gynecological cancer. The main objective is to estimate the proportion of patients with treatment modifications. METHOD: This is a multicenter prospective study conducted in 3 university gynecological cancer departments (HCLyon, France) during the period of confinement (March 16 to May 11, 2020). All patients with non-metastatic breast cancer or gynecological cancer were included. The planned treatment, postponement, delay and organizational modifications (RCP, teleconsultations) were studied. RESULTS: Two hundred and five consecutive patients were included, average age 60.5±1.0. 7 patients (3.4%) had SARS-Cov-2 infection, 2 patients died. One hundred and twenty-two patients (59.5%) had a treatment maintained, 72 patients (35.1%) postponed, 11 patients (5.4%) cancelled. Of the 115 (56.1%) planned surgeries, 40 (34.8%) postponed, 7 cancelled (6.1%). 9 patients (7.8%) had a surgical modification. Of the 59 (28.8%) radiotherapy treatments scheduled, 24 (40.7%) postponed and 2 (3.4%) cancelled. Of the 56 (27.3%) chemotherapy treatment planned, 8 (14.3%) postponed and 2 (3.6%) cancelled. One hundred and forty-five patients (70.7%) have been discussed in multidisciplinary meeting. One hundred and fifty-eight patients (77%) had a teleconsultation system. CONCLUSION: Our study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on therapeutic management of patients with gynecological cancer during the period of confinement. This will probably improve our management of an eventual epidemic rebound or future health crisis.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/therapy , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Antineoplastic Agents , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Female , France/epidemiology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/epidemiology , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Remote Consultation/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Withholding Treatment/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL